Technicals

How to Build a Merger Model: Pro Forma Combination

How to build a merger model by combining buyer and target financials, purchase accounting, synergies, financing effects, and pro forma EPS math.

Updated Jul 2, 2026 / 5 min read

On this page

How to build a merger model starts with the pro forma combination: buyer financials plus target financials, adjusted for purchase accounting, financing, synergies, and new share count. The output is usually pro forma EPS, which tells you whether the deal is accretive or dilutive. Wall Street Prep defines a merger model as the analysis used to evaluate the financial impact of an M&A transaction, especially the effect on the acquirer's EPS. The model is not just two income statements pasted together. You must add the target, adjust for new debt interest or stock issuance, include realistic synergies, and reflect goodwill and purchase accounting. This lesson covers the skeleton that the accretion dilution shortcut assumes.

TL;DR

  • A merger model combines buyer and target financials, then adjusts for deal financing and purchase accounting.
  • Pro forma EPS equals adjusted combined net income divided by pro forma diluted shares.
  • Cash and debt create after-tax interest effects; stock increases share count.
  • Goodwill is created when purchase price exceeds the fair value of identifiable net assets.
  • The model's interview output is usually accretive, dilutive, or breakeven EPS impact.

What is a merger model?

A merger model estimates what the acquirer will look like after buying the target. In a public-company acquisition, the central question is often EPS impact: does pro forma EPS go up or down compared with the buyer's standalone EPS? Wall Street Prep's merger-model tutorial frames the model around combining the financial statements of the acquirer and target and measuring accretion or dilution. In interviews, you do not need to build a full Excel model from scratch, but you do need to explain the steps and the logic behind each adjustment.

What are the steps to combine the companies?

Start with the buyer's standalone income statement. Add the target's income statement for the same forecast period. Then layer in transaction adjustments: synergies, incremental D&A from asset write-ups, new interest expense from debt financing, lost interest income from cash used, and new shares from stock consideration. Finally, divide adjusted combined net income by the pro forma diluted share count.

StepAdjustmentEPS effect
Add target net incomeAdds earningsAccretive
Add cost synergiesAdds after-tax incomeAccretive
Add debt interestReduces net income after taxDilutive
Use cashReduces interest income after taxDilutive
Issue sharesRaises denominatorDilutive

This is why M&A consideration mix matters. The same target can be accretive with cash and dilutive with stock.

What is the pro forma EPS formula?

The interview version is:

Pro Forma EPS=Buyer NI+Target NI+After-Tax AdjustmentsBuyer Diluted Shares+New Shares Issued\text{Pro Forma EPS} = \frac{\text{Buyer NI} + \text{Target NI} + \text{After-Tax Adjustments}}{\text{Buyer Diluted Shares} + \text{New Shares Issued}}

After-tax adjustments include synergies, incremental interest expense, lost interest income, and new amortization or depreciation from purchase accounting where relevant. If pro forma EPS exceeds buyer standalone EPS, the deal is accretive. If it is lower, the deal is dilutive.

What is a worked example?

Suppose the buyer has 100 million dollars of net income and 50 million shares, so standalone EPS is 2.00 dollars. The target has 20 million dollars of net income. The buyer funds the deal with debt that creates 8 million dollars of pre-tax interest expense, and the tax rate is 25 percent. There are no synergies and no stock issued. After-tax interest expense is 6 million dollars. Pro forma net income is 100 plus 20 minus 6, or 114 million dollars. Shares stay at 50 million, so pro forma EPS is 2.28 dollars.

Pro Forma EPS=11450=2.28\text{Pro Forma EPS} = \frac{114}{50} = 2.28

Since 2.28 dollars is above 2.00 dollars, the deal is accretive by 0.28 dollars, or 14 percent.

If the same buyer issued 10 million new shares instead of using debt, combined net income would be 120 million dollars and pro forma shares would be 60 million. EPS would be exactly 2.00 dollars, so the deal would be breakeven before synergies. This is the cleanest way to see why financing mix changes the answer even when the target's standalone earnings are identical. The operating deal did not change. The denominator changed.

How do purchase accounting and goodwill fit?

Purchase accounting adjusts the target's balance sheet to fair value after the acquisition. If the buyer pays more than the fair value of identifiable net assets, the difference becomes goodwill. That logic is covered in goodwill and purchase accounting. In a full merger model, purchase accounting can create incremental D&A or amortization, which reduces pro forma net income. In a shorter interview model, candidates often mention goodwill conceptually and focus the math on financing effects and EPS.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of a merger model?

The purpose is to estimate the financial impact of an acquisition on the buyer, most commonly whether pro forma EPS is accretive or dilutive.

Is a merger model the same as an accretion dilution model?

They overlap. Accretion dilution analysis is usually the key output of a merger model, but a full merger model also includes purchase accounting, balance-sheet adjustments, financing schedules, and sometimes detailed forecasts.

Why does stock consideration dilute EPS?

Stock consideration increases the buyer's share count. Even if net income rises from adding the target, EPS can fall if the new shares increase the denominator too much.

Why does debt financing often help accretion?

Debt is often cheaper than equity after tax because interest is tax-deductible. If the target's earnings yield exceeds the after-tax cost of debt, debt financing pushes the deal toward accretion.

Should synergies always be included?

No. Include only realistic, defensible synergies. Cost synergies are easier to model than revenue synergies because they usually have clearer timing and probability.

Sources